Blog

  • Why you shouldn’t keep a journal?: Marc Andreessen on having Zero Introspection

    Marc Andreessen on a recent podcast with David Senra made a very provocative remark: “You should have zero levels of introspection. Just move forward.”

    For a long time now, I have had psychological therapy. Some of these people have asked me to “think about it.” And here is an extremely successful person, being listened to by me—someone who should be doing better—and thinking, “Well have I been wrong all along?”

    All this time—I thought I may have been building self-awareness. And yet—maybe what has been going on is the complete opposite of that. Introspection does not build self-awareness—it builds self-delusion.

    Which leads me to the question—¿What exactly is introspection and how is it different from reflection? ¿Should we stop reflecting as well? ¿What then is extrospection? (If this even is a thing.

    1 – ¿What exactly is introspection and how is it different from reflection?

    Let’s go to the dictionary (in this case the Cambridge Dictionary)

    Introspection:

     –  examination of and attention to your own ideas, thoughts, and feelings:

    Reflection: 

    1) the image of something in a mirror or on any reflective surface

    2) the return of light, heat, sound, or energy from a surface

    3) a sign or result of something

    4) serious and careful thought:

    Wow—they could not be more different. Introspection is about attention. Reflection—is about energy, results and thought.

    You would think that introspection would help you to think clearly—yet, we do not even see thought as a verb in the definition. It is much more about looking at something and letting it sit. Letting it talk to you. Letting it fester. 

    Reflection on the other hand is about action. 

    We want to see something in the world. We want to bring something out into the world. Reflection is social.

    2) ¿Should we stop reflecting as well?

    We have pre-supposed that we should stop introspecting. Let’s first think about that. 

    And to me—it seems like we should. Introspection is passive—and this life is clearly about action. It’s about making the word flesh, and creating what the Gods channel through us.

    It’s not so much about admiring that from within. We are vessels—and we should ride the waves. It’s not about stopping when the sirens ring. It’s about tying yourself to the vessel and continuing. We don’t stop and watch. We think things through. 

    Getting clarity on the difference allows us to see this: 

    Introspection is what happens when you don’t really have someone to talk to.

    When you can’t leave it out on the floor.

    When you can’t externalize how you feel.

    When you don’t have any friends. 

    So don’t introspect. Reflect with friends. It’s good to go into a “Hall of Mirrors” at time. 

    Mirror neurons—or the neurons that fire when you do something with someone else—are responsible for helping you understand others. They are what fire when we learn from someone. And if you are prescient enough to step outside the “Hall of Mirrors” every once in a while—the “Mirrors” will be different enough that you begin to see how the shape of the mirror can become an Optical Illusion. 

    You begin to see the world in a place of fantasy. You begin to put on glasses—and from here on out—your fatness, your skinniness, your shortness and your tallness—though they may be grounded in reality, they may also be grounded in illusion. 

    You begin to look for the reality—not by feeling, but my measuring. Science happens when you go outside.

    You can’t feel yourself through an experiment.

    Go out and touch stuff.

    3) ¿What then is extrospection?

    Well—science kind of is. But science is systematic. Extrospection is more organic—happening here, now all the time. And an extrospector is someone who notices. Notices the world around them—and has the potential to do something because of that. And then—they also notice you—and they might be able to help you understand how you feel, clarify what you think, and become a part of your life.


    When introspecting—you become self-absorbed, when extrospecting, you are here to serve others. And service is useful. Service makes you useful. You become important to us.

    So don’t introspect. Reflect. And Reflect puts your light into the world. So we can all see it. Enjoy it. And allows us to not lose ourself in the darkness.

    Oh—and one more thing…

    I have to say it in Spanish—because it comes from an emotional core:

    Las amistades multiplican los gozos y dividen los dolores.

    Friends double our joys and halve our sorrows.

    Share with friends. Don’t introspect. And if someone is introspecting—loop them out. The world will have all the feedback they need. When you stay inwards—there is nothing to feed on—you will only starve your existential self.

  • On Mentorship and Relationships

    I’ve been having conversations with special people these days, one of the major remarks I shared with them is:

    “Everyone of us is where we are today because someone gave us an opportunity, someone put a word on our favor. So, being grateful and pay it forward is a must.”

    Therefore, I’ll go a bit further with additional thoughts on mentorship:

    Why Mentorship? Receiving guidance, instructions, orders are not mentorship. These are activities oriented actions, focused on standardization and consistency.

    In Process Management human touch is an “input”, however in Decision Making judgement is the “differenciator”. In this context, Mentorship is the most effective vehicle to improve judgement over time.

    It is a matter of Value sharing. This is an important one, mentorship principal resource is the time of the mentor and the mentee. Therefore, Value sharing both ways is fundamental because of the opportunity cost factor.

    Focus on the long-term. Mentorship is not a one time conversation and done! It is more a transformational continuum. Every life experience, conversation, reflection are inputs for iterations.

    All of the above comes down to Relationships building and, that’s why this is the assignment.

    In order to share the best from us, we must first fulfill our own with clarity of purpose, strong values foundation, genuine relationships, people who bet on us. Individualism just bring the spark, keeping the flame alive is a collective effort where heat nurture everyone who collaborate with that endeavor.

    Will you do a real effort to forge long-term relationships? I hope you do!!

  • On the Right kind of Ambition

    Ben Horowitz argument in his book “The Right Thing About Hard Things” the following:

    “The right kind of ambition is ambition for the company’s success with the executives’s own success only coming as a by-product of the company’s victory.

    The wrong kind of ambition is ambition for the executive’s personal success regardless of the company’s outcome.”

    This is powerful stuff, “Leadership” on my opinion, is a privilege that have been and will be always earn because the group (be it Family, Work Team, Organization, Society, Community) decide, consciuosly or unconsciously, to follow and support the vision and execution guidelines the Leader promote.

    This cannot be taken from granted, for the simple truth that in a blink of an eye Leadership badge can be remove.

    Therefore, I would like to share a personal posture on “Ambition” as a foundational element of drive to excellence and for a life well lived:

    Position yourself to success is a non-negotiable. However, it cannot be at all cost because if you get it burning bridges along the way, once you’re done. How will you enjoy the rewards if nothing left behind? 🧐

    We get into the real challenges when balancing the sweetspot between perfoming and goals accomplishments.

    Getting confuse about your personal contribution as part of whole or your contribution as the definite element of success. Is the main factor that disrupt the natural flow of things.

    The call to action here is that “ambition” must be contrasted with the wellbeing of the “greater Good”. If taken out of the sight, the bucket of the wrong kind of ambition will keep receiving adherents. And it is not what we are striving for.

    Will you make your call and reflect about the right kind of ambition and its impact for the greater good?

  • On the Gap between Narrative and Execution

    When sharing ideas with the Mastermind group, I had a breakthrough argument that went like this:

    “To put things in motion Vision, Strategy, Roadmaps, Alignment are non-negotiables when make things happen is the desire Goal. However, achieving that demand tons of resources and energy that could motivate confusion between the end goal (Value generation) and a simple phase (Planning process).

    If the above mention not translate into Value to Society and Businesses. It doesn’t make sense at all.

    So, my main question is ¿When will narrative make it through words, arguments, vision boards, planning sessions? And switch to execution mode with the direction and intention agreed in all those planning activities.

    Some drivers that motivates this huge gap between narrative and execution are:

    • No effective translation mechanisms and tools.
    • Avoidance of commitment from key players.
    • Weak decision making dynamics.
    • Inability to present transparently power shifts needs and trade-offs.
    • Misalignment of incentives and behaviors.

    It can be frustrating when posturing, politics and accountability shortage take the lead in driving group (countries, societies, businesses) behaviors.

    Aspects to take into account to strength the execution-driven lines of action are:

    • Acknowledge that Groups optimize for different reward systems (time horizon, autonomy, meaning, security).
    • Clarify Decision Rights (who decides what, and how fast).
    • Incentive Design (the real driver).

    In a nutshell, planning and direction are non-negotiables to accomplish big goals. Nonetheless, not a sufficient condition to assure making things happen. Therefore, execution must take lead to effectively support Value creation and delivery.

    Will you take the opportunity to understand the direction and priorities of your current context? And, then put you in #ExecutionMode where real magics occurs. 🗯️

  • On Being Humble and Accountable

    I’m reading Annie Duke’s Thinking in Bets book, when going through this paragrah:

    “Self-serving bias has immediate and obvious consequences for our ability to learn from experience. Blaming the bulk of our bad outcomes on luck means we miss opportunities to examine our decisions to see where we can do better. Taking credit for the good stuff means we will often reinforce decisions that shouldn’t be reinforced and miss opportunities to see where we could have done better. To be sure, some of the bad stuff that happens is mainly due to luck. And some of the good stuff that happens is mainly due to skill. I just know that’s not true all the time. 100% of our bad outcomes aren’t because we got unlucky and 100% of our good outcomes aren’t because we are so awesome. Yet that is how we process the future as it unfolds”.

    Leads me to a reflection about the situations (Business meetings, Friends circles, Study groups) where “Pretending” becomes the path to reach good positioning and visibility.

    Relying on superior skill when context is not stated in a transparent way open doors to missleading expertise or mastery.

    What we can control are the actions, being more specific, the immediate next action to the intended goal. Based on that, Luck is often define as the intersection between Opportunity and Preparation. Preparation is in our control, however, Opportunity can be nudge but not controlled at will.

    Therefore, being open-minded and humble about the role of luck in our day to day accomplishments is liberating and gives us room to enjoy life.

    Will you be more aware and humble about the role of luck vs pretending superior skills?

  • On Time Horizons and Decision Making

    I was listening couple of days ago an interview with Tony Robbins, where he shared three powerful skills for improvement: Pattern Recognition, Pattern Utilization and Pattern Creation.

    I’ll keep the first one to anchor the point I’m focus to bring home. Participating in several forums, business conversations and knowledge sharing spaces. I started to get annoyed with the conflicts, tensions and frictions with people divergent arguments.

    After observing my repeated reactions, I started to reflect about what triggers those reactions, questioning whether is a personal reaction or Noise being taking as Signal.

    I arrived to the following rationale:

    “Most conflicts are not disagreement about reality. It’s disagreement about Timing”.

    For me, this was a soft landing to help calm those past urges.

    Why is that? Again, incentives matters, life is too short to be wasted. So, short-term results and risk aversion tend to drive us and set the tone when decisions are posed at the table and demand execution.

    However, separating in layers and express transparently when the context + collective interests rest on:

    • Survival
    • Positioning, or
    • Franchise

    Must help to build bridges between conflicting arguments and push for directed actions towards the collective GOOD.

    When embarked in important missions, those connected to personal wellbeing, business management, public service positions. Identifying the time horizons where the Collective are nudged to will generate more collaboration and push in a healthy way towards better outcomes for everybody.

    Will you get into collective decision making with your Time Horizons crystal clear?

  • A Reflection On Frameworks and Benchmarks

    I consider myself an advocate of systems and structures, just for the sake of reproducibility and reliability of processes that delivers Value.

    Not just that, it’s a matter of putting something to work (ideation, design, implementation, scale, repeat) with the capacity to solve problems and improve our world.

    Context drive reality, and context is the convergence of a set of interest that interact and collide in Chaos dynamic. Thankful for that, it means we will always have fun 😃.

    However, frameworks and structures are “Means” not “Ends”. Clarity on that must help to avoid sanctify systems performance that aren’t adding Value. This is the true disease I’m trying to bring home.

    Systems Design have tons of moving parts, nonetheless is just that, nodes which can be move around (at a cost!!). So, looking around for frameworks and structures that don’t match context is a waste of resources with huge opportunity costs.

    In a nutshell, “let first understand context, then the problem at hand. Lastly, look for frameworks that could guide the problem solving. Not so sure if the other way around generate Value”.

  • Future of Work and the New Economy

    Reading the New Economy Skills Report 2025 from the WEF, I got a sense of being exposed to that kind of arguments before.

    So, I remembered the first time reading a Future of Work Report in 2018 or 2019. Where they were presenting the opportunities and risks derived from the fast changing landscape of jobs. Placing special attention to the mandate from Upskilling and Reskilling.

    Now with AI boom, the anxiety and uncertainty that I found myself exposed is annoying.

    Reviewing this Report where the emphasis is on Human-Center skills (Innovation, Creativity, Adaptability), looks like the “differentiation” from the processing machine is getting more traction nowadays.

    That helps reinforce the phrase “Until the Status Quo get challenge big time and, that false sense of Security is on danger. Action becomes top 1 Priority”

  • Trial Post

    The Quest for the Journey give you the change to go far beyond your current mind edge.